Our historic postmodern, post racial, post partisan president is not the perfect president, as he himself has acknowledged. Butt Lady M? She is perfect: the perfect wife, perfect mom and perfect First Lady. Butt you already knew that.
So welcome to Big Guy’s postmodern presidency (PMP) that evolves around his own sun and resides in its own alternate universe. Of course, he didn’t build that himself. The MSM built that for him.
Allow me to cover some of the more salient points of the PMP universe:
In our world this is not the face of racism:
“They're going to put y'all back in chains,"
Because he’s a Democrat, and therefore champion of all minorities. So it doesn’t matter what words come out of his mouth even if they happen to be something like “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," which would be racist if they came out of the mouth of a rich white Republican who hates black people and wants to kill your babies.
Nor is it racism for the New Black Panthers to take Big Guy’s idea of “a civilian military force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded” to the next level. So when they say they want their own inner city military to murder white babies it’s not racist. I’ll have to go over the details as to exactly why this isn’t racism at a later date. For now, just note that if you, or your people, are now, or ever have been, oppressed you can only be a victim of racism not a perpetrator.
National Field Marshal for the New Black Panthers King Samir Shabazz, explains how the New Black Panthers are implementing Big Guy’s call for a civilian national security force:
CAUTION: GRAPHIC
(h/t: Breitbart and Big Guy)
Goodness! That sort of takes your breath away. Those people (is that racist?) make the Reverend Wright sound like a boy scout.
So what does constitute racism in PMP world? Glad you asked: just about anything a Republican candidate says about anything, especially if it can be tied in some way to our PMP. For example, when Romney criticized Big Guy for dropping work requirements for welfare recipients by fiat, the verdict was swift: racist - according to our official “Truth Team”
In this postmodern, post racial, post partisan world all truth is relative, all political attacks are deemed to be equal in order to make things fair. Here, Breitbart analyzes Politico’s analysis:
Politico…cites the following attacks:
- From Vice President Joe Biden: “They gonna put ya’ll back in chains.”
- From Mitt Romney: “Mr. President, take your campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago and let us get about rebuilding and reuniting America.”
- From Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt: Romney is “unhinged.”
- From Obama: Romney put a dog on the roof of his car.
- From Romney: Biden’s comments on coal, in which he said that coal caused more deaths than terrorism, showed his lack of vision for the country.
- The Obama campaign has called Romney a felon and a murderer.
You may be noticing a pattern: Romney’s campaign is responding to the repulsive vitriol of the Obama campaign by calling them out on promoting “division, anger, and hate.” The Obama campaign is calling Romney an incipient slaver, an insane person, a criminal, and a killer. These are not equivalent. Romney attacks Obama on his coal policy; Obama attacks Romney on having a dog on his car roof decades ago. These are not equivalent.
So, when R2 accuses Team Obama of cutting $700 billion from current Medicare recipients, arbitrarily and capriciously, to fund other Obamacare programs, Big Guy’s team says: “yeah, but Romney flew his horse to the Olympics.” See there, they’re equal. Because Romney is a Republican. And Rich. And he abuses his pets.
And if he’d do this to his horse, what would he do to poor brown people? H/T JVR
You should also note, in case you haven’t yet, that in our alternate universe, taking $700 billion out of Medicare coverage for CURRENT participants to fund Obamacare is not partisan; butt offering options for FUTURE Medicare participants in order to prevent it from going belly up is partisan. And racist! That’s all you really need to know.
And where the Gabby Gifford, Dark Knight and Sikh temple shootings were the result of Sarah Palin and the rightwing hate machine, the Family Research Center (FRC) shooting doesn’t even warrant a mention, so apparently there was no hate there, just a nut. Unless you count the fact that the FRC is itself a hate group, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. And who would know a hate group when they see it better than the SPLC?
And again, please note for your records of postmodern, post racial, post partisan America that the Fort Hoot shooting was a case of workplace violence while the Sikh temple shooting was a hate crime. No-ooo, the FRC shooting was NOT a hate crime. As I just explained, the FRC is a hate group:
Even after the shooting of a security guard at the Family Research Council, the Huffington Post can’t stop slamming the pro-family group as a “hate group.” The Huffington Post waited less than 3 hours before publishing an article which complained about “the Family Research Council, which the Southern Poverty Law Center deems a hate group.”
Therefore, any retaliation against said “hate group” is deemed to be a case of legal stand-your-ground self-defense.
Okay then, I guess that’s enough philosophical political science education for one day. There’s a lot more subject matter to cover and I’ll try to do that as the campaign season heats up.
For now though, let me wrap up with a little good news: TOTUS’ Triumphant Return!
Although frankly I was a lot more comfortable when he stuck to scrolling words, just words. This new role makes me feel a tad insecure.
Linked By: Nice Deb, and Clarice on JustOneMinute, and Mireille Buser on facebook, and AnnieLaurie76 on twitter, and BlogsLucianneLoves, and NOBO2012 on Free Republic, Thanks!
Posts
