What we know so far:
The Clinton Conflicts of Interest Foundation did indeed receive contributions from foreign governments and corporations while Hills was conducting d’affaires of state.
Hillary did in fact have her own private email system and server and her official, and possibly classified, correspondence were not archived, as required by federal law and State Department rules. Also, they were not, as required by federal law and court orders, included in State Department responses to requests from Congress and several FOIAs.
Big Guy misremembered first finding out about the private email on the news - like everybody else - before he re-remembered knowing about it all along.
Valarie Jarrett “did not have email communications with that woman, Ms. Clinton. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never.”
Huma Abedin-Wiener, deputy chief of staff to Hills during the time period in question, also used a private email run through the Clinton server in her communications with the boss. Butt that has nothing to do with Huma’s family having some disturbing ties to the Muslim Brotherhood:
Her father is said to be close with the Saudi government's Muslim World League, and her mother is said to be a member of the Muslim Sisterhood.
Causing Andrew McCarty to research and report:
"The ties of Ms. Abedin's father, mother and brother to the Muslim Brotherhood are both specific and substantiated."
So why that would make people wonder what was in those clandestine emails I can’t imagine. I suppose they might want to know who benefited politically and financially from their relationship with Clinton and/or Abedin. Or maybe they just want to know generally what Hillary knew and when she know it.
Butt clearly this is all an extension of the rightwing conspiracy that has been at working against the Clinton’s for over 20 years, right, James?
It’s not surprising to find that Carville, the old reliable Clinton apologist, is back on the payroll considering the seriousness of the charges currently hovering around Hillary. Watch how a consummate leftist defends the defenseless with timeless liberal logic and straw men:
Andrea Mitchell: “Why should she be the person deciding, or her circle, decide which e-mails to turn over? Isn’t that the problem with a private e-mail system that isn’t government archived?”
James Carville: “Are you saying that she’s a crook? Because if she does not turn over relevant stuff, that’s against the law. So is that what we’re really gonna say here? I don’t think we really want to say that.”
Well played! Does anyone do faux outrage as well as James Carville? So far he’s the only thing completely transparent in the Hillary camp. Like they say: "If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find." In this case a low-class political hustler who will do stupid people tricks for food.
So buckle your seatbelts: Hillary will be taking to the mic this afternoon to further explain the unexplainable and defend the defenseless. Also, to declare that she is not a crook.
“People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook. Well, I’m not a crook. I’ve earned everything I’ve got.”
Linked By: American Digest, and Larwyn’s Linx on Doug Ross@Journal, and BlogsLucianneLoves, and Free Republic, Thanks!
Cross-Posted on Patriot Action Network
Posts
