Hillary, original author of the ‘Russian Kahlusion (10 parts Kahlua, 10 parts Stoli) cost me the election’ theory, is still at it.
Five years later and she’s still whining about the Russia backed Macedonian content farmers who stole the election from her; further proof that you can always rely on Democrats accusing their opponents of doing exactly what they do themselves.
But this time, to prove how dreadful Russia is, she blamed them for the Brexit vote as well. You can watch it here if you wish but to spare you from having to actually listen to the bitter old hag rag on, this is essentially what she said during a British think tank discussion about the ‘future of liberal democracies’.
…Clinton once again resurrected the Russian boogeyman, and suggested that: ‘I think there was also significant evidence of Russian involvement, if not influence or interference, in Brexit.’
Of course she hasn’t a wit of proof to back her claim, but that’s scarcely a requirement in today’s arena of ideas. One could argue that her old boss, Obama, ran more demonstrable interference on the Brexit vote than Russia even thought of.
Still, it’s good to see that Hillary’s got that old bounce back in her step. And I see that she’s resurrected that youthful Benghazi-gate era hairstyle that was always so attractive. You know, the thin, flat, stringy and lifeless style that serves as such a good metaphor for her Russia-interference-cost-me-the-election-theory.
Yeah, that’s a good look on a stupid old broad. The pearls are a nice touch.
Is it just me or does her lack of facial symmetry bother anyone else? Does it grow with age like noses and ears or does it require cosmetic fillers and copious doses of duplicity to achieve? In any event I think it goes well with the dead fisheyes.
But I digress: my original intent was to ask if you think Wretchard doesn’t have a point here:
Nah, that’s probably not it.
I’ll take Chinese Collusion for $2 billion
Posts
